The Neurophone

It was proposed by Donald Hebb (1949) that cortical activity is organized in functional groups ('cell assemblies') that form the building blocks of computational processes by the coordinated activity of the participating neurons. This hypothesis prompted neuroscientists to record from multiple neurons at a time, to observe their simultaneous activity. Such parallel activity is analyzed for correlated activity e.g. in terms of coincident spiking activity (e.g. Riehle et al, 1997; Singer, 1999) and/or spatio-temporal patterns (e.g. Prut et al, 1998), and results are typically displayed for visualization. Another approach would be to use our auditory perceptional abilities in order to identify temporal structures in the neuronal activity. The neurophone, introduced by Aertsen & Erb (1987) suggests the idea to 'audialize' neuronal activity by presenting their simultaneous activity in a form compared to music.

Electrical signals recorded from electrodes in the brain next to neurons are reduced to the time stamps when action potentials (spikes) occurred, since the amplitude of spikes are of unique height and do not carry information. Thus, doing this for multiple neurons recorded in parallel, we get for each neuron a time series of marked points in time, which we treat as the time of occurrences of musical notes. Each neuron we treat as a single 'voice' and assign a different tone to each of them. The result is a piece of 'neuromusic', in which each neuron contributes with its tone at each time it emitted a spike.

The pieces we are listening to (implemented by Sonja Gruen (www.mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de) and Michael Erb (www.medizin.uni-tuebingen.de), 1992) were translated from recordings 1) from prefrontal cortex in awake behaving monkey involved in a sensorimotor behavioral task (Vaadia et al, 1989), 2) from data of neural network simulations of synfire chains (Diesmann et al, 1999) and 3) from data recorded in primary motor cortex of awake behaving monkey involved in a delayed-response handmovement task (Riehle et al, 1997).






Camera Silens


Donald Hebb, als Vater der sensorischen Deprivation sowieso einer der ganz Großen.

The McGill studies arose out of the theories of Donald O. Hebb, as published in his 1949 book The Organization of Human Behavior, and were attempts to verify his hypothesis that tedious and uniform stimulation led to a degeneration in the ability to think and reason effectively (Brownfield, 1965).

Hebb and his colleagues at McGill began their studies in 1951 with 22 male college students as subjects. The subjects were payed $20 U.S. per day to lie in bed and do nothing. The subjects wore translucent goggles, which permitted diffuse light to pass through but prevented patterned vision, and cardboard cuffs and gloves to limit tactual information. The cubicle in which they stayed was partially soundproofed and auditory stimulation was further reduced by a masking noise (Schultz, 1965).

Despite the high level of pay for doing absolutely nothing, the experimenters had a hard time keeping subjects past the third day. During the first day, most subjects would sleep, but by the second and third days the subjects became bored and began reporting difficulties in concentration and seeing visual, kinesthetic (moving), and somasthetic (feeling) hallucinations (Schultz, 1965).

Quelle.


Haha. Die Hebb-Regel ist auch eine der theoretischen Grundlagen des Medienmodells in meiner Diss.


In der Welt der Deprivierten

Donald Hebb, der Unvermeidliche. Ob im Isotrakt oder in der Aufmerksamkeitsforschung, man kommt nicht um ihn herum.